Description: AGENDAHED.JPG
  

Item No:                    5E.

 

Meeting Date:           February 11, 2013

 

From:                          Ray Sharp

 

Subject:                      Discussion item relating to use of city-owned light towers by non-profit organizations

 

 


Staff Recommendation:

No recommendation – discussion only.

 

Analysis:

The agenda for the January 14, 2013 meeting of the city commission contained a discussion item relating to policy for loan of city-owned light towers to non-profit organizations.  The commission requested additional information and followup.

 

Mr. Kalv has provided a followup report with additional information, attached for your reference.

 

In brief, the city owns four light towers, two in electric, one each in water and wastewater.  The original purchase price of these ranged from $6,780 to $7, 947.  Two were purchased in 1999 and two in 2001.  Based on hour meter readings, three of the towers are used around 110 hours per year on average, one is used about 30 hours per year.  There have been no extraordinary maintenance costs.

 

Other information may be summarized as follows:

 

Mr. Kalv offered staff recommendations.  After review of the recommendations, I concur with most, and offer the following suggestions for discussion:

 

Options:

1.  Based upon commission discussion, direct staff to bring forward a resolution formalizing the intent of the commission; or,

2.  Such alternative action as the Commission may deem appropriate

 

Fiscal Impact: 

Based upon historical usage, the fiscal impact is minimal, so long as reasonable limitations are imposed on such usage.  The benefit to public safety and the community at large is likely much greater than the expense of loaning the light towers.

 

Submission Date and Time:    2/6/2013 2:37 PM____

 

Department: Executive

Prepared by:  R. Sharp                     

Attachments:         Yes____   No ______

Advertised:   ____Not Required ______                     

Dates:   __________________________                     

Attorney Review :       Yes___  No ____

                                                

_________________________________           

Revised 6/10/04

 

Reviewed by: Dept. Head ________

 

Finance  Dept. __________________                                     

                              

Deputy C.M. ___________________                                                                         

Submitted by:

City Manager ___________________

 

Account No. N/A

 

Project No. ___________________

 

WF No. ______________________

 

Budget  ______________________

 

Available _____________________